Saturday, July 03, 2010

On moral luck and human vulnerability

I was in Mumbai on that December night in 1984 when tragedy struck in Bhopal. I was head of an American multinational’s Indian subsidiary, a company not unlike Union Carbide, whose managing director also happened to be my friend. We were among a few foreign companies that had stayed on and had toughened under the punishing conditions of the ‘license-quota-permit raj’. I was in shock over the horrific human tragedy but my sadness came from another thought, ‘what if it had been me’? I placed myself in his shoes and wondered if I would have acted differently? Probably not, and I thought about human vulnerability and how unbelievable lucky I was.

The epic, Mahabharata, reminds us that life is uncertain. Just as Yudhishthira is consecrated ‘universal sovereign’, he gets trapped in a rigged game of dice and loses everything, including his kingdom and his wife. The loaded dice is a metaphor for the fragile human condition. Imagine, if life is a game of dice governed by rules known to be deceptive, in which the least competent player is forced to stake everything, knowing full well that he will lose? Imagine too that death is the only outcome of the game. ‘In such a world one mostly fights for time,’ says David Shulman, the great Sanskrit scholar.

Clouds of poisonous gas rose in the night sky of December 3 from the Union Carbide factory, killing some 2,250 people and affecting 578,000 others. Of that number, it is estimated that between 15,000 and 25,000 people died subsequently, and tens of thousands of others remain sick to this day. No one in India seemed to know how to cope with the greatest disaster in industrial history and I could feel frustration rising in the nation as the days rolled on. Our national frustration then was not unlike America’s growing aggravation today as each new drop of BP oil that leaks into the Gulf of Mexico.

Twenty five years later, a court has awarded a two year sentence of rigorous imprisonment to seven persons, including my friend, in the Bhopal case. There has been national outrage both at the delay and the lightness of the sentence. Indignation at the sentence is understandable for so horrific a disaster--the human psyche seeks equally gruesome punishment to maintain moral equilibrium. The dawdling pace of justice in India is, of course, a national disgrace which diminishes us daily, but the fact is that crime and punishment in an industrial disaster is a difficult and complex issue.

In order to establish a higher level of crime would require showing criminal intent or prior knowledge of the disaster. For a higher sentence, the prosecutor would have to link the leaking of gas by an unbreakable chain of events to failure of individuals. It is difficult to imagine that directors or employees could have known that negligence on their part would lead to catastrophe of such proportions, and if they had known of the consequences, would they have ignored it? In the absence of intent, the only crime is of ‘rashness and negligence’ and for which the managers have been punished. But I am not sure if even that sentence will be sustained in appeal. The managers at Union Carbide knew they were dealing with a hazardous chemical but had no inkling that either the plant design or their operation was flawed. The 1982 audit report had pointed out few infirmities but they had reportedly rectified them.

The ‘evidentiary link’ was also missing in Andersen’s case, and this explains why India has failed to extradite him. The same logic applies to criminality in the recent, disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Nevertheless, Carbide got away by paying a paltry penalty for the worst industrial disaster in history. It is especially galling when you compare with what BP has paid and will end up paying. The tiny payment has fanned anti-multinational sentiment in India and reinforced a belief that multinationals have double standards. The truth is that multinational operations throughout the developing world are run to much higher technical and managerial standards than local companies. Look, for example, at the safety standards of the Indian railways. When did we last try to jail a railways minister or employee for negligence?

I compliment the Group of Ministers for their balanced and determined approach in recent weeks. It has restored sanity in our society whose discourse had been overtaken by a lynch-mob mentality. They have rightly recognized that the first and foremost duty is to the victims of the disaster and their survivors. Dow Chemicals, although it has no legal responsibility, should share in the financial burden as an act of magnanimity. If only the government had shown this sanity and determination twenty-five years ago so much suffering and tragedy could have been averted.

The lesson from Bhopal and from BP’s oil spill is that we need tort remedies to address the risk of future disasters. The legal system should not allow private individuals to keep the gains from dangerous activity and pass off losses to the public. We require liability to be fixed in advance on companies. Once these remedies are in place we can relax our ever-present licence-permit mentality. Solid insurance underwriting is likely to do a better job in pricing risk than any program of direct government oversight. This logic also suggests that America needs to rethink the Price Anderson Act's $375 million cap on damages to cover nuclear power disasters.

All this has reinforced my belief in the ancient Greek idea of moral luck. It could have been me sleeping innocently on December 3rd under the poisonous cloud. It could have been me working for Union Carbide? The Greeks knew that human life is fragile, but their lyric poet, Pindar, felt that its peculiar beauty also lay in human fragility. He compares a human being to a fragile vine ever in need of fostering weather. It needs gentle dew and rain and the absence of sudden frosts--and it needs caring keepers. So do human beings need fostering, but we also need to keep clear of catastrophe. Greek philosophers hoped to banish contingency by living a life of reason. Ancient Indians, on the other hand, believed that righteous action according to dharma would reduce their vulnerability.

India is becoming a venturesome, entrepreneurial society like America. Humans have a tendency to procrastinate. We don’t take advance measures because disaster is distant and unlikely. Prevention is costly and tedious, and frankly there is so much to do in the here and now. Since the consequences could be ominous, the low risk of occurring should not be a reason to ignore it. So, we need regulation. Regulation should be strong enough to reduce risk, yet not so strong as to stifle our new found entrepreneurial energy. We want regulators to work cooperatively with companies but not to be captured by them--‘crony capitalism’ is an ever present danger in our young capitalist democracy. In the end, no amount of regulation will prevent catastrophe. Humans are prone to err. What is needed is dharma or good faith among both companies and officials to limit harm. Regulators should also remember that costs forced on companies become higher costs for consumers.

Gurcharan Das is the author of ‘The Difficulty of Being Good: On the Subtle Art of Dharma’

20 comments:

Arun Sivadasan said...

Wonderful post! Until I read your article, I never thought that (perhaps) the people who managed the plant never had any criminal intent or prior knowledge of the disaster.

Always enjoying reading your article.

PS: I have been trying to get a copy of your book, 'The difficulty of being good.' I checked in 5 different book stores in the last 3 days. Everywhere, it's out of stock!

Moulshri said...

Are you being naive Mr Das or is it simply a hurriedly written pience on Bhopal like a hundred others we come across in our press to say that "It is difficult to imagine that directors or employees could have known that negligence on their part would lead to catastrophe of such proportions, and if they had known of the consequences, would they have ignored it?"
The factory had already claimed one life due to poor safety measures before Dec 1984 and the news of its continuing negligence reported by Raajkumar Keswani since 1982 (Bhopal jwalamukhi ki kagaar par September 1982 Jansatta). It worries me when you, in all the insightful historic references, have somehow missed our Cassandra of Bhopal!

Maria Mcclain said...

You have a very good blog that the main thing a lot of interesting and beautiful! hope u go for this website to increase visitor.

subha hari said...

This post is shocking, in its ignorance of well-established facts on Bhopal, even more so in its eagerness to condone criminal corporate recklessness as "human fragility". The managers at Union Carbide had more than “an inkling” that catastrophe was around the corner. They made a deliberate choice not to implement in Bhopal, the corrective measures they took in their plant in the USA. And your parting advice to regulators is that "costs forced on companies become higher costs for consumers!" Gee Mr. Das, I'm sure the 150,000+ people left dead or disabled in Bhopal are thrilled the rest of us could buy cheaper batteries.

Ramesh Purohit said...

I enjoyed reading GD until I saw this piece on Bhopal and to me it smacked of like having a soft corner for his fellow MD. I remember the night when the gas leaked and my loved ones were living there. I wonder how could GD evan had the inkling about the magnanimity of Dow Chemicals? I wish GD should think about the pain and suffering of multitude of people. The tone of this feature is sickening. Period,

Roop said...

The dice is always loaded against the common man.It seems to me you are trying to defend Union carbide by drawing parallels with Mahabharta. UC knew that they were dealing with a hazardous chemical, and that fact, should have prompted them to be extra cautious in every respect, whether plant design or operation process.
Mr. Das please be as objective in your assessment of corporations as you are of the Government. With your skillful use of words you have portrayed the whole incident as a matter of luck, which it was not.
Indias' fledgling entrepreneurial socity needs to be nurtured no doubt. But it has to be with effective oversight.No corporation is going to spend any money for the safety and benefit of public without the checks of a regulatory authority

Anonymous said...

Mr. Das,

We can draw parallels here:

Rama talking to Vali and Ravana.
Krishna talking to Duryodhana.
Obama talking to BP chairman.

In each case, the powerful put the sole blame on the weak although they ought to have shared the responsibility equally.

Obama swiftly set aside all rules in case of BP, but did not apply that same yardstick to Dow.

India on the other hand was (-still is) too weak to prevail over US in a like manner.

The first GoM did not do anything, so the current GoM from the same political party cannot speak out.

Don't overlook the fact that Anderson was so powerful that while jumping bail tea by the President of India.

No point in lamenting luck.
It's all about power.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Das,

You are preaching foresightedness in preventing OTHER potential disasters.

But here the state and central governments have failed in the post-disaster management in this very case.

Further, the hazardous site is lying open for 28 years, endangering the very same people of Bhopal even more. Nothing is done so far.

Why do we have to hunt for hypothetical cases elsewhere?

Can you expect a team that has consistently failed to address a disaster to take proactive actions?

Anonymous said...

GoMs have only done a cover up job.

The first GoM never did anything. No records are available about their decisions or even opinions.

29 years later, the second GoM passed the burden on common man. Like the CWG, this too will be a grand opportunity to make money, even as the victims will be ditched yet again collectively.

Anonymous said...

The delivery of even this warped justice took 26 long years because the same judge was also handling many other petty offenses like pick-pocketing!

Were we REALLY committed to justice?

Why was that case not given a fast track?

Compare that with how the Kasab case was handled, although the death toll was a tiny fraction.

I think our justice system has lost its objectivity.

Find Hotels said...

Great thoughts...wonderful.Makes one speechless.

Anonymous said...

The article was not impressive, unlike GD. I think as people age, they lean more towards "Dharma" when unable to arrive at concrete answers.

It is the human innate nature to blame others for any catstrophe, rather than own moral responsibilty. Whether the person is in Government or corporate sector. It hardly makes any difference. This article evidences the soft corner GD has for fellow MD's. I even felt let down when reading the article.

harsha babu said...

What is DI What is 3D What is Makeup How to Makeup what is editing What is RR What is Filming How to design a set What is Composting What is Storyboard What is a Storyboard How to Edit a Movie What is a Story Board Script Writing canon 5d mark iii What is Screenwriting What is Special Effects Red Camera How to Direct a Film What is Filmmaking How to Write a Script Cinematography How to make a Film What is Costume Design What is Film Making

Anonymous said...

Heya i'm for the primary time here. I found this board and I to find It truly helpful & it helped me out a lot. I am hoping to offer one thing again and aid others such as you aided me.

My web site :: acoustic guitar chords for beginners

Anonymous said...

I have read so many articles regarding the blogger lovers however this article is in fact a
pleasant post, keep it up.

Have a look at my blog post uxaxa.org

Anonymous said...

I do not know if it's just me or if everybody else experiencing issues with your website. It looks like some of the written text on your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This may be a problem with my internet browser because I've had this happen previously.
Thanks

My weblog ... www.redsolehighheelshoes.com

Anonymous said...

Howdy just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the images aren't loading properly. I'm not
sure why but I think its a linking issue. I've tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same results.

Take a look at my blog :: コーチアウトレッ&#12488 コーチバッグ コーチバッグ

Anonymous said...

Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.
I'll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I'll certainly
return.

My weblog: コーチアウトレッ&#12488 コーチアウトレット コーチアウトレット

Anonymous said...

Hello, I check your blog regularly. Your humoristic style is awesome, keep up the good work!


Feel free to visit my page; cheap nike air max shoes

Anonymous said...

Great post. I will be going through some of these issues as well.
.

Here is my blog post; cheap nike air max shoes